Why Ilhan Omar’s “Fed Exemption for Hemp” Has No Application Process

21 USC 822(d) has no application process.

 

21 USC 822(d) covers a class of activity, such as religious use of peyote.

 

21 USC 822(d) should be between a state and the federal administration, like it is between that church and the federal administration.

 

There is no application, but a state attorney general could contact the U.S. Attorney General and ask for a waiver.

You have to understand who has the higher authority, a state or a federal administrative official.

 

Most people think Congress authorized that administrative official and because of that the administrative official has the higher authority.

But, Congress did not give that administrative official authority because the authority is only to make a decision on a waiver.

 

If Congress had predetermined the outcome of that decision, then the administrative official would have the higher authority.

 

But that is not what Congress did.

 

So, the state has the higher authority.

 

The decision still might stand if it is consistent with the public health and safety, but a State is going to have a strong presumption of being the better judge of what’s best for the people.

 

So, it could end up in federal court, as it probably should, under federalism.


Comments

2 responses to “Why Ilhan Omar’s “Fed Exemption for Hemp” Has No Application Process”

  1. Carl Olsen Avatar
    Carl Olsen

    The federal exemption for the use of Schedule 1 peyote by a church in 21 C.F.R. 1307.31 is based on the statutory authority in 21 U.S.C. 822(d). It’s obvious a church asked for it. So, when a state sets up an intrastate cannabis program, it’s the state that must ask for the waiver under 21 U.S.C. 822(d). There is no reason a church would enjoy greater protection than a sovereign state.

  2. Carl Olsen Avatar
    Carl Olsen

    Here is the kicker.  Congress removed hemp from the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801-971, in 2018.  The DEA cannot schedule it, re-schedule it, or de-schedule it under 21 U.S.C. 811(a).  The DEA cannot grant an exemption for it under 21 U.S.C. 822(d).  A State could make any hemp product from non-hemp cannabis, and the DEA could grant an exemption for that. Stupid is as Stupid does.

Leave a comment

Is this your new site? Log in to activate admin features and dismiss this message
Log In