Tag: cannabis RFRA

The State opposes Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, arguing: II. ARGUMENT A. State Has Compelling Interests Under Strict Scrutiny B. Burden on Religion is Not “Substantial” C. Precedent Rejects Broad Exemptions III. CONCLUSION The Motion to Dismiss should be denied because: Dated: [XX/XX/XXXX]Respectfully submitted,[Prosecutor Name][County State’s Attorney Office] Strategic Takeaways for Defense Rebuttal ************************************************* IN THE…